바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

민주주의와 인권 그리고 기록물의 역할과 기능

Democracy, Human Rights and the Function of Archives

한국기록관리학회지 / Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, (P)1598-1487; (E)2671-7247
2009, v.9 no.2, pp.41-58
https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2009.9.2.041
김정하 (대진대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

역사적으로 권력과 기록물의 관계는 불가분의 관계이다. 기록물은 권력행위의 기록된 흔적이며 권력의 의지는 기록물의 존재에 상당한 영향을 미친다. 민주주의 사회에서 권력은 자신의 행위를 증거하는 기록물을 통해 국민에게 봉사하며 동시에 자신의 투명성을 증명한다. 하지만 그 반대의 경우 권력은 국민을 탄압하고 불행으로 이끈다. 이처럼 기록물은 민주주의의 핵심인 권력의 균형을 위해서도 매우 중요한 역할을 수행한다. 기록물의 상징성과 역할을 고려할 때, 이들에 대한 합리적이고 올바른 관리는 궁극적으로 국민의 권리보호에 직결된다.

keywords
original order, boomerang effect, historical archives, democracy and archives, balance of power, reconciliation and the true, original order, boomerang effect, historical archives, democracy and archives, balance of power, reconciliation and the true, 원질서, 부메랑 효과, 역사기록물, 민주주의와 기록물, 권력과 기록물, 화해와 진실

Abstract

Historically the relation between the power and archives is inseparable. Archives are the recorded traces of political actions and an intention of power has a considerable effect on the existence of archives. In the democratic society the power serves people on the basis of the archives adopted as an evidence of political actions. Archives play an important role for the balance of power, which is a principle point of democracy. Considering the function and symbolism of archives, its proper and reasonable management is connected directly to the protection of people’s rights.

keywords
original order, boomerang effect, historical archives, democracy and archives, balance of power, reconciliation and the true, original order, boomerang effect, historical archives, democracy and archives, balance of power, reconciliation and the true, 원질서, 부메랑 효과, 역사기록물, 민주주의와 기록물, 권력과 기록물, 화해와 진실

참고문헌

1.

Block, D. Broadcast and Archive:Human Rights Documentation in the Early Digital Age. http://molodiez.org/dms420/hr_archives.htm.

2.

Bobbio, N. (1984). Il futuro della democrazia,una difesa delle regole del gioco:Einaudi.

3.

Bobbio,N. (1990). L'eta' dei diritti:Einaudi.

4.

Brutti, M. Disciplina degli archivi dei servizie riforma del segreto di Stato:SISSCO.

5.

Chigas,G. (2000). Building a Case Against the Khmer Rouge: Evidence from the Tuol Sleng and Santebal Archives. Harvard Asia Quarterly, 4(1), 44-49.

6.

Costa, P. (1989). Cittadinanza:Laterza.

7.

De Lutiis, G. (1996). Il lato oscuro del potere.Associazioni politiche e strutture paramilitari segrete dal 1946 a oggi:Editori Riuniti.

8.

Dewerpe, A. (1976). Espion:Gallimard.

9.

Fugueras, R. A. (2002). Archivese! Los Dcumentos del poder. El poder de los documentos. Alianza Editorial, 59, -.

10.

Giannulli,A. (2005). L'armadio della Repubblica:Nuova Iniziativa Editoriale.

11.

Gilbert,J. (2000). Access Denied: the Access to Information Act and its effect on public records. Archivaria, 49, 84-117.

12.

Harris, V. (2002). They Should Have Destroyed More. in Archives and the Public Good: Accountability and Records in Modern Society:The Destruction of Public Records.

13.

McDonald, L. (1998). Legal Matters, in International Council on Archives, Interdependence of Archives. Proceedings of the Twenty Ninth (-). Thirtieth and Thirty First International Conference of the Round Table on Archives. XXIX Mexico.

14.

McKemmish, S. Archivists at Risk: accountability and the role of the professional society. www.sims.monash.edu.au/research/rcrg/publications/archive1.html.

15.

McKinnon,S. (1994). The Sports Rorts Affair: A Case Study in Recordkeeping,Accountability and Media Reporting. New Zealand Archivist, 4, 1-5.

16.

Noguères,H. (1984). La Vie quotidienne des résistants de l'armistice à la liberation,Paris:Hachette,26,cit.,in A.Dewerpe,Espion.142. Hachette, 26, -.

17.

Pisa,P. (1978). Le premesse ‘sostanziali' della normativa sul segreto di Stato in Segreto di Stato egiustizia penale:Zanichelli.

18.

Quintana,A.G. (1998). Archives of the Security Services of Former Repressive Regimes. Report prepared for UNESCO on behalf of the International Council Archives.

19.

Quintana,A.G. (2004). Los archives de la represión: balance y perspectiva. Comma, 2, 59-74.

20.

Salvi,G. (1998). Occulto e illegale. La gestione degli archivi e il controllo di legalita'. Studi storici, XXXIX, 1048-1057.

21.

Sofri,A. (1991). L'ombra di Moro:Sellerio.

22.

Theoharis,A.G. (1998). A Culture of Secrecy. The Government versus the people's Right to Know:University Press of Kansas.

23.

Wallace,D.A. Impausible Deniability:The Politics of Documents in the Iran Contra Affair,Archives and the Public Good:Accountability and Records in Modern Society,ed.

24.

Richard J. Cox. .

25.

Wiener,J. (1998). National Securty and Freedom of Information: The John Lennon FBI Files, in A Culture of Secrecy: The Government Versus the People's Right to Know:University Press of Kansas.

26.

Zelinski, B. La Mémoire unifiée? L'héitage équivoque des archives de la RDA. Vintième siècle. Revue d'histoire. www.persee.fr.

27.

De Felice,F. (1989). Doppia lealta' e doppio stato. Studi storici, XXX(3), 493-563.

28.

Foucault, M. (1976). Sorvegliare e punire.Nascita della prigione:Einaudi.

한국기록관리학회지