- 권한신청
- P-ISSN1598-1487
- E-ISSN2671-7247
전자증거개시상의 위험에 대응한 기업기록정보관리 방안
Business Records and Information Management as Preparation for e - Discovery Risks
이해인 (서강대학교 법학전문대학원)
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
초록
국내외에서 특허나 제조물책임과 관련하여 그 어느 때보다 각종 소송에 노출되어 있는 기업들은 전자증거개시에 효과적으로 대처할 준비를 해야 한다. 이 연구는 기업 소송 사례를 통해 증거개시 과정에서 드러난 위험성을 기록정보관리 측면에서 분석하고, 이를 토대로 기업의 기록정보관리 방향을 제안하기 위한 것이다. 판례조사를 통해 삼성전자, 코오롱 등 국내 기업들이 전자증거개시 과정에서 ‘방어가능한 처분’에 실패한 요인을 분석하였고, 이러한 요인을 고려하여 소유․점유․관리하고 있는 전자정보의 파악과 통제, 신의성실에 입각한 처분중지 보장, 합리적 기록보유정책의 수립과 이행이라는 세 영역별로 정책방향을 제시하였다.
- keywords
- business records management, e-Discovery, Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, spoliation of evidence, litigation hold, legal hold, defensible disposition, record retention policies, inventories, retention schedules, Samsung Electronics, Kolon, 기업기록관리, 전자증거개시, 연방민사소송규칙, 증거인멸, 기록정보관리, 처분중지 통지, 방어가능한 처분, 기록보유정책, 인벤토리, 보유일정표, 삼성전자, 코오롱
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to suggest the directions for record and information management (RIM) strategies for Korean companies as preparation for e-Discovery risks. It begins with the articulation key concepts and some RIM issues of e-Discovery, which is governed by the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedures. It analyzes three lawsuit cases for which Korean companies were sued by North American companies in order to determine the main reasons behind the defensible disposition failures. Based on the analyses, it suggests the RIM strategic policies for preparing the e-Discovery, including the development of inventories for documents and ESI in their possession, custody, or control; ensuring legal hold programs in good faith; and making defensible retention policies.
- keywords
- business records management, e-Discovery, Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, spoliation of evidence, litigation hold, legal hold, defensible disposition, record retention policies, inventories, retention schedules, Samsung Electronics, Kolon, 기업기록관리, 전자증거개시, 연방민사소송규칙, 증거인멸, 기록정보관리, 처분중지 통지, 방어가능한 처분, 기록보유정책, 인벤토리, 보유일정표, 삼성전자, 코오롱
참고문헌
가산종합법률사무소. 한국 기업이 미국 소송의 당사자가 된 경우 유의해야 할 점 -Litigation Hold. http://kasaninsight.tistory.com/98.
권혁심. (2014). 이메일증거의 인멸과 제재. 민사소송, 18(1), 181-213.
김도훈. (2007). 電子證據開示에 관한 美聯邦法院判決의 檢討 -ZUBULAKE v. UBS WARBURG LLC 사안을 중심으로-. 법학연구, 17(3), 151-180.
김도훈. (2009). 美國 證據開示節次上 電子證據의 湮滅에 관한 硏究. 중앙법학, 11(1), 117-142.
김정환. (2015). 효율적인 증거개시․수집을 위한 제도 개선 방안:대법원 사법정책연구원.
설문원. (2015). 기업 소송에 대비한 정보거버넌스의 구축 방안 - 세도나 정보거버넌스 원칙을 중심으로 -. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 46(4), 325-354.
손경호. (2012). 특허소송 핵심 , ‘ 이디스커버리 ' 주목해야. http://www.zdnet.co.kr/news/news_view.asp?artice_id=20120927085552&type=det.
유정호. (2013). e-Discovery 이해와 위기관리 전략:인포더박스.
Business judgment rule. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_judgment_rule.
Kahn, Randy.. (2013). Chucking daises : Ten rules for taking control of your organization's digital debris:ARMA International.
Legal hold law & legal definition. http://definitions.uslegal.com/l/litigation-hold/.
Smallwood, Robert F.. (2014). Information governance : Concepts, strategies and best practices:John Wiley & Sons.
The Sedona Conference. (2016). The Sedona Conference commentary on rule 34 and rule 45"possession, custody, or control". The Sedona Conference Journal, 17(2), 467-575.
The Sedona Conference. (2014). The Sedona Conference commentary on information governance (125-170). The Sedona Conference Journal.
The Sedona Conference. (2010). The Sedona Conference commentary on legal hold: The trigger & the process. The Sedona Conference Journal, 11(Fall), 265-287.
United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. E.I. Dupont de Nemours and Company, Plaintiff, v. Kolon Industries, Inc., Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:09cv58. Aug. 30, 2012 (894 F.Supp.2d 691).
United States District Court. D. New Jersey. Mosaid Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Austin Semiconductor, L.P., Defendants. No. 01-CV-4340 (WJM). Dec. 7, 2004 (348 F.Supp.2d 332).
United States District Court. Northern District of California. San Jose Division. Order granting-in-part Apple’s motion for an adverse inference jury instruction (Re: Docket No. 895). July 24, 2012, Paul S. Grewal, United States Magistrate Judge (Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK).
United States District Court. Northern District of California. San Jose Division. Samsung’s notice of motion and motion for spoliation adverse inference instruction against Apple; Declaration of Alex Binder; Proposed order. July 26, 2012 (Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK).
United States District Court. Northern District of California. San Jose Division. Order Re:Samsung’s motions for de novo determination of dispositive matter referred to Magistrate Judge, or, in the alternative, motion for relief from nondispositive pre-trial order of Magistrate Judge. 2012. 8. 21. Jucy. H. Koh, District Judge (Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK).
Volonino, Linda. (2009). E-Discovery for dummies:John Wiley & Sons.
(2012). What does the Apple-Samsung discovery/spoliation fight portend for the rest of us?. http://www.redgravellp.com/sites/default/files/2012%2009%2018%20Apple%20Samsung%20Discovery%20Buzz.pdf.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수