바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

미국 국무부의 외교사료집 편찬과 기록학적 쟁점

Compilation of the Foreign Relations of the United States Series and the Archival Issues

한국기록관리학회지 / Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, (P)1598-1487; (E)2671-7247
2013, v.13 no.1, pp.159-179
https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2013.13.1.159
이상민 (한국국가기록연구원)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

이 연구는 외교사료집의 편찬에서 나타나는 기록학적 쟁점을 미국의 외교사료집(FRUS)이 발간되는 역사적 과정을 통해 분석한다. 그러한 기록학적 쟁점에는 기록의 이용의 한 방법인 외교사료집 편찬의 목적과 의의, 비밀 외교기록의 해제와 공개 활용 문제, 국가안보 정보의 보호와 외교정책의 설명책임성 제공 간의 균형 모색, 외교사 편찬의 공정성의 문제, 그리고 역사기록 편찬의 방법과 원칙 등을 들 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 FRUS 시리즈에 관해서 네 가지 주제를 분석한다. 첫째, FRUS의 출판 내용과 맥락을 살펴본다. 둘째, FRUS 시리즈의 발전에 큰 영향을 준 주요한 전환기에 나타났던 정치적, 기록학적 쟁점에 대한 논의를 소개하고 분석한다. 셋째, 역사기록 선별과 비밀해제를 포함한 FRUS 시리즈 편찬의 업무절차와 편찬 원칙을 개관한다. 넷째, FRUS의 적시 출판에 지장을 준 국가안보기관의 비밀기록에 관한 접근 및 비밀해제의 절차와 현황에 대해서 살펴본다.

keywords
역사편찬, 외교사료, 사료편찬, 미국외교사, 다큐멘터리 역사, historical compilation, diplomatic documents, U.S. diplomatic history, FRUS, documentary history

Abstract

This study traces the evolution of the compilation of foreign relations of the United States series and analyzes its archival issues from its historical development. The study examines the purposes of publishing the compilations of the diplomatic documents, an issue of making a balance between secrecy for national security and accountability of diplomacy, neutrality in compiling historical materials, and methods and principles of the compilation. To analyze these records issues, the study examines the contents and contexts of the compilation, historical evolution of the compilation, and the political and records issues of the compilation in the U.S. political history. The declassification issue for the historical compilation was also examined because the issue was a major obstacle to the timely publication of FRUS.

keywords
역사편찬, 외교사료, 사료편찬, 미국외교사, 다큐멘터리 역사, historical compilation, diplomatic documents, U.S. diplomatic history, FRUS, documentary history

참고문헌

1.

김정은. (2011). 외교문서 공개제도의 현황 및 개선안 (-). 외교안보연구원 외교사연구센터 학술회의 『외교사연구 활성화와 외교문서의 활용』.

2.

마상윤. (2011). 외교사 연구의 의의와 외교문서의 활용 (-). 외교안보연구원 외교사연구센터 학술회의 『외교사 연구 활성화와 외교문서의 활용』.

3.

우승지. (2011). 외교문서 해제집 발간 의의 및 추진 방안 (-). 외교안보연구원 외교사연구센터 학술회의 『외교사 연구 활성화와 외교문서의 활용』.

4.

우철구. (2012). 프랑스의 외교문서집 발간 사례 (-). 국립외교원 외교안보연구소 외교사연구센터 학술회의 『2012년 외교문서 공개와 외교사 연구』.

5.

이상민. (2012). 미국의 외교문서집 발간 사례 (-). 국립외교원 외교안보연구소 외교사연구센터 학술회의 『2012년 외교문서 공개와 외교사 연구』.

6.

이완범. (2012). 한국형외교문서집 발간의 필요성 및 의의 (-). 국립외교원 외교안보연구소 외교사연구센터 학술회의 『2012년 외교문서 공개와 외교사 연구』.

7.

Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation for 2007. (2007). Report of the Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation for 2007. Perspectives on History. http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2008/0809/0809not1.cfm.

8.

Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation. (2011). Meeting Minute, December 12-13, 2011. http://history.state.gov/about/hac/december-2011.

9.

Ahlberg, Kristin L.. (2008). Public History and Public Audiences: the U.S. Department of State and Its Historical Advisory Committee. Perspectives on History. http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2008/0801/0801pub1.cfm.

10.

American Historical Association. (2009). Chair of U.S. State Department’s Historical Advisory Committee Resigns in Protest. Perspectives on History. http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2009/0901/0901new3.cfm.

11.

Botts, Joshua. (2011). FRUS at WAR: Appeasement, Alliance Polotics, and the Paris Peace Conference Volumes. http://history.state.gov/frus150/research/frus-at-war.

12.

Botts, Joshua. (2011). Eureka!: The 1925 FRUS Order (and Why You Should Be Nice to Archivists). http://history.state.gov/frus150/research/eureka-the-1925-frus-order.

13.

Botts, Joshua. (2011). No Policy Issue Can Be of Comparable Importance: The 1980 FRUS Re-Review. http://history.state.gov/frus150/research/1980-rereview.

14.

Botts, Joshua. (2011). Out of the Frying Pan Into the Fire: The Politics of the Yalta FRUS. http://history.state.gov/frus150/research/politics-of-the-yalta-frus.

15.

Botts, Joshua. (2011). The problem that you have undertaken to help us with is one of very, very great difficulty (-). The Formation of the Historical Advisory Committee and the First HAC Meeting. FRUS Sesquicentennial Research.

16.

Botts, Joshua. (2012). A Burden for the Department?: To The 1991 FRUS Statute. http://history.state.gov/frus150/research/to-the-1991-frus-statute.

17.

Brynn, Edward. (2011). The Foreign Relations of the United States Series: An Orientation. http://history.state.gov/frus150/research/brynn-on-frus-an-orientation.

18.

Cozzens, Peter. (2011). A Surprising Manifestation of Backbone: The 1872 Foreign Relations Affair. http://history.state.gov/frus150/research/the-1872-frus-affair.

19.

Dennet, Tyler. (1925). Principles to Guide the Editing of “Foreign Relations," attachment to a Memorandum from Tyler Dennett to the Secretary of State. http://static.history.state.gov/frus150/1925-order.pdf.

20.

Louis, Williams. (2008). William Louis (President of American Historical Association & Chairman of Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation) to Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of State, “Foreign Relations of the United States Documentary Series.”. http://www.fas.org/sgp/advisory/state/wrlouis112808.pdf.

21.

Marrs, Aaron W.. (2011). The Constitutional Basis of FRUS. http://history.state.gov/frus150/research/constitutional-basis-of-frus.

22.

Marrs, Aaron W.. (2011). Publicizing Foreign Relations in time of War: the Foundation of the Foreign Relations of the United States. http://history.state.gov/frus150/research/foundation-of-frus.

23.

National Coalition for History. (2008). State Department: Crisis in the Foreign Relations Series. http://historycoalition.org/2008/12/12/state-department-crisis-in-the-foreign-relations-series/.

24.

Office of Inspector General, Department of State. (2009). Management Review of the Office of the Historian. Bureau of Public Affairs, U.S. Department of State.

25.

Office of the Historian, Department of State. (1925). Secretary Kellogg’s “Principles to Guide the Editing of ‘Foreign Relations’” and Cover Memoranda. http://history.state.gov/frus150/research/1925-order.

26.

Office of the Historian, Department of State. (2013). Foreign Relations of the United States: Status of the Series. http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/status-of-the-series.

27.

Perkins, E.R.. (1950). Department of State, Foreign Relations of the Unites States Diplomatic Papers, 1933 (in Five Volumes), Vol. 1, General:U.S. Government Printing Office.

28.

U. S. Department of State. (2010). Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969-1976, Volume XIX, Part 1, Korea, 1969-1972. http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v19p1.

29.

U.S. Department of State. (2003). Foreign Relations of the United States, Vol. 1~Vol. 41. Vol.E-1~Vol. E-15. http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/nixon-ford.

30.

U.S. Senate. Public Law 102-138: An Act to authorize appropriation for fiscal years 1992 and 1993 for the Department of State, and for other purposes, SEC 198. the Foreign Relations of the United States Historical Series.

31.

U.S. President. Executive Order 13526 on “Classified National Security Information”.

32.

U.S. President. Executive Order 13526, Sec. 1.5. Duration of Classification.

33.

U.S. President. Executive Order 13526, Sec. 3.7 National Declassification Center.

34.

U.S. President. Executive Order 13526, Sec. 3.3. Automatic Declassification.

35.

U.S. President. Executive Order 13526, Sec. 3.4. Systematic Declassification Review.

36.

U.S. President. Executive Order 13526, Sec. 3.5. Mandatory Declassification Review.

37.

U.S. President. Executive Order 13526, Sec. 3.3. Automatic Declassification, (b)(1)~(9).

38.

U.S. President. Executive Order 13526, Sec. 4.4. Access by Historical Researchers and Certain Former Government Personnel; Sec. 4.1.(a)(3)항.

한국기록관리학회지