초록

최근 메타데이터 표준의 국제적 흐름은 기록을 둘러싼 다양한 맥락정보를 개체로 설정하고 이들 각 개체 간의 다양한 관계를 보여주는 다중 개체 모형의 적용이다. 이에, 이 논문에서는 다중 개체 모형을 적용한 기록관리 메타데이터의 표준인 ISO 23081-2, 호주, 뉴질랜드, 호주의 뉴사우스웨일즈주, 퀸즈랜드주, 사우스오스트레일리아주 표준의 특징을 비교 분석하였다. 분석은 1) 적용범위, 2) 개체수, 3) 개체 내 카테고리, 4) 요소 설계 방법을 중심으로 비교하고, 다중 개체에 있어서 가장 핵심인 관계(relationship) 개체가 어떻게 구현될 수 있는지, 실제 사례를 통해 살펴본다. 마지막으로 앞선 분석을 통해 다중 개체 모형을 적용하여 표준을 제정 할 때 고려해야 할 몇 가지 사항들을 정리해 본다.

Abstract

The multiple entity data model which contains metadata that associate two or more entities is applied recordkeeping metadata standard in recent years. This paper described and analyzed the recordkeeping metadata standard applying multiple entities such as ISO 23081, Australia recordkeeping metadata Standard, New Zealand recordkeeping metadata Standard, New South Wales recordkeeping metadata Standard, Queensland recordkeeping metadata Standard recordkeeping metadata Standard, South Australia recordkeeping metadata Standard, focusing on scope, the number of entities, category in entity, metadata elements. And shows some examples of relationship entity which is the key of multiple entity. As a result of the analysis, this paper suggests some consideration when recordkeeping metadata standard applying multiple entities is revised.

초록

Abstract

Digital resources are widely used in our modern society. However, we are facing fundamental problems to maintain and preserve digital resources over time. Several standard methods for preserving digital resources have been developed and are in use. It is widely recognized that metadata is one of the most important components for digital archiving and preservation. There are many metadata standards for archiving and preservation of digital resources, where each standard has its own feature in accordance with its primary application. This means that each schema has to be appropriately selected and tailored in accordance with a particular application. And, in some cases, those schemas are combined in a larger frame work and container metadata such as the DCMI application framework and METS. There are many metadata standards for archives of digital resources. We used the following metadata standards in this study for the feature analysis me metadata standards - AGLS Metadata which is defined to improve search of both digital resources and non-digital resources, ISAD(G) which is a commonly used standard for archives, EAD which is well used for digital archives, OAIS which defines a metadata framework for preserving digital objects, and PREMIS which is designed primarily for preservation of digital resources. In addition, we extracted attributes from the decision tree defined for digital preservation process by Digital Preservation Coalition (DPC) and compared the set of attributes with these metadata standards. This paper shows the features of these metadata standards obtained through the feature analysis based on the records lifecycle model. The features are shown in a single frame work which makes it easy to relate the tasks in the lifecycle to metadata elements of these standards. As a result of the detailed analysis of the metadata elements, we clarified the features of the standards from the viewpoint of relationships between the elements and the lifecycle stages. Mapping between metadata schemas is often required in the long-term preservation process because different schemes are used in the records lifecycle. Therefore, it is crucial to build a unified framework to enhance interoperability of these schemes. This study presents a basis for the interoperability of different metadata schemas used in digital archiving and preservation.