초록

이 논문은 메타데이터 표준 요소 중 특히 맥락 관련 요소를 실행의 관점에서 평가하고 개선방안을 제안하기 위한 것이다. 이를 위해 우선 기록관리 메타데이터 표준 요소들이 국가기록원이 개발 보급한 표준 RMS에 어떻게 반영되었는지 RMS 데이터 테이블, 장기보존포맷 기술규격 등을 토대로 분석하였다. 둘째, 표준 RMS를 운영 중인 4개 공공기관과 국가기록원 RMS 운영센터를 방문하여 RMS를 통한 데이터 조회와 면담을 토대로 메타데이터 축적 현황과 문제점을 조사하였다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로 공공표준 측면과 RMS 기능 개선 측면으로 나누어 개선방안을 제안하였다.

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to evaluate Korean Records Management Metadata Standard with special emphasis on the contextual elements in their implementation aspect, and to provide the direction of the Standard revision for improving the metadata quality of RMS developed by National Archives of Korea. The present paper begins with comparing RMS data and the Standard elements, and examines the problems of current accumulation practices of contextual metadata elements in the RMS. Finally it makes some suggestions concerning the Standard revision as well as RMS function upgrade.

초록

Abstract

Digital resources are widely used in our modern society. However, we are facing fundamental problems to maintain and preserve digital resources over time. Several standard methods for preserving digital resources have been developed and are in use. It is widely recognized that metadata is one of the most important components for digital archiving and preservation. There are many metadata standards for archiving and preservation of digital resources, where each standard has its own feature in accordance with its primary application. This means that each schema has to be appropriately selected and tailored in accordance with a particular application. And, in some cases, those schemas are combined in a larger frame work and container metadata such as the DCMI application framework and METS. There are many metadata standards for archives of digital resources. We used the following metadata standards in this study for the feature analysis me metadata standards - AGLS Metadata which is defined to improve search of both digital resources and non-digital resources, ISAD(G) which is a commonly used standard for archives, EAD which is well used for digital archives, OAIS which defines a metadata framework for preserving digital objects, and PREMIS which is designed primarily for preservation of digital resources. In addition, we extracted attributes from the decision tree defined for digital preservation process by Digital Preservation Coalition (DPC) and compared the set of attributes with these metadata standards. This paper shows the features of these metadata standards obtained through the feature analysis based on the records lifecycle model. The features are shown in a single frame work which makes it easy to relate the tasks in the lifecycle to metadata elements of these standards. As a result of the detailed analysis of the metadata elements, we clarified the features of the standards from the viewpoint of relationships between the elements and the lifecycle stages. Mapping between metadata schemas is often required in the long-term preservation process because different schemes are used in the records lifecycle. Therefore, it is crucial to build a unified framework to enhance interoperability of these schemes. This study presents a basis for the interoperability of different metadata schemas used in digital archiving and preservation.

초록

최근 메타데이터 표준의 국제적 흐름은 기록을 둘러싼 다양한 맥락정보를 개체로 설정하고 이들 각 개체 간의 다양한 관계를 보여주는 다중 개체 모형의 적용이다. 이에, 이 논문에서는 다중 개체 모형을 적용한 기록관리 메타데이터의 표준인 ISO 23081-2, 호주, 뉴질랜드, 호주의 뉴사우스웨일즈주, 퀸즈랜드주, 사우스오스트레일리아주 표준의 특징을 비교 분석하였다. 분석은 1) 적용범위, 2) 개체수, 3) 개체 내 카테고리, 4) 요소 설계 방법을 중심으로 비교하고, 다중 개체에 있어서 가장 핵심인 관계(relationship) 개체가 어떻게 구현될 수 있는지, 실제 사례를 통해 살펴본다. 마지막으로 앞선 분석을 통해 다중 개체 모형을 적용하여 표준을 제정 할 때 고려해야 할 몇 가지 사항들을 정리해 본다.

Abstract

The multiple entity data model which contains metadata that associate two or more entities is applied recordkeeping metadata standard in recent years. This paper described and analyzed the recordkeeping metadata standard applying multiple entities such as ISO 23081, Australia recordkeeping metadata Standard, New Zealand recordkeeping metadata Standard, New South Wales recordkeeping metadata Standard, Queensland recordkeeping metadata Standard recordkeeping metadata Standard, South Australia recordkeeping metadata Standard, focusing on scope, the number of entities, category in entity, metadata elements. And shows some examples of relationship entity which is the key of multiple entity. As a result of the analysis, this paper suggests some consideration when recordkeeping metadata standard applying multiple entities is revised.